Last Update: May. 20, 2019, 5:16 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Captiva and Mazda Tribute

What is Better Chevrolet Captiva or Mazda Tribute?

Exterior

Chevrolet Captiva Mazda Tribute

14 reasons to buy Chevrolet Captiva

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 9.6 45% or 7.9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 88 mm 4% or 4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

148 bhp vs 124 bhp

110 kw. vs 91 kw.

16% or 24 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 175 nM 45% or 145 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.8 sec. vs 13 sec. 2.2 sec.
More top speed 114 mph vs 105 mph 9 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 119 g/mile vs 139 g/mile 17% or 20 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Less CO emissions 0 g/mile vs 1 g/mile 0% or 1 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 61 liters 6% or 4 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2505 kg vs 1890 kg 25% or 615 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 735 kg vs 525 kg 29% or 210 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 710 kg 5% or 40 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1500 kg 25% or 500 kg

7 reasons to buy Mazda Tribute

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 84.8 mm vs 83 mm 2% or 1.8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.99 mpg vs 39.2 mpg 31% or 9.21 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 37.7 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 21% or 7.86 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.2 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 45% or 9.91 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 71 dB vs 72.9 dB 3% or 1.9 dB
Other specs
Less weight 1365 kg vs 1770 kg 30% or 405 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11.5 meters 6% or 0.7 meters

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Captiva vs. Mazda Tribute

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5300 RPM 25% or 1300 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1989 cm3 0% or 2 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4635 mm vs 4395 mm 5% or 240 mm shorter
Width 1850 mm vs 1800 mm 3% or 50 mm wider
Height 1720 mm vs 1765 mm 3% or 45 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2705 mm vs 2620 mm 3% or 85 mm more
Front tires size 215/70 R16 vs 215/70 R16
Rear tires size 215/70 R16 vs 215/70 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs 215/70 R16
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 6.5JX16" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)