Last Update: May. 25, 2019, 5:11 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Captiva and Mazda Xedos 9

What is Better Chevrolet Captiva or Mazda Xedos 9?

Exterior

Chevrolet Captiva Mazda Xedos 9

12 reasons to buy Chevrolet Captiva

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 10.0 43% or 7.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 80.3 mm 3% or 2.7 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 74.2 mm 19% or 17.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 320 nM vs 290 nM 9% or 30 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 119 g/mile vs 152 g/mile 28% or 33 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 930 liters vs 420 liters 55% or 510 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2505 kg vs 1985 kg 21% or 520 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 735 kg vs 439 kg 40% or 296 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 500 kg 33% or 250 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1500 kg 25% or 500 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.5 meters vs 12.2 meters 6% or 0.7 meters

10 reasons to buy Mazda Xedos 9

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

211 bhp vs 148 bhp

155 kw. vs 110 kw.

30% or 63 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.5 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 1.3 sec.
More top speed 143 mph vs 114 mph 29 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 28.2 mpg vs 39.2 mpg 39% or 11 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.7 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 24% or 8.86 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 20.21 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 59% or 11.9 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 71 dB vs 72.9 dB 3% or 1.9 dB
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 68 liters vs 65 liters 4% or 3 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1546 kg vs 1770 kg 14% or 224 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Captiva vs. Mazda Xedos 9

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5300 RPM 25% or 1300 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 2255 cm3 12% or 264 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 4 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4635 mm vs 4830 mm 4% or 195 mm shorter
Width 1850 mm vs 1770 mm 4% or 80 mm wider
Height 1720 mm vs 1395 mm 19% or 325 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2705 mm vs 2750 mm 2% or 45 mm less
Front tires size 215/70 R16 vs 225/45R17
Rear tires size 215/70 R16 vs 225/45R17
Spare wheel Compact vs 225/45R17
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 7JX17 alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)