Last Update: Mar. 18, 2019, 5:01 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Captiva and Renault Twingo

What is Better Chevrolet Captiva or Renault Twingo?

Exterior

Chevrolet Captiva Renault Twingo

12 reasons to buy Chevrolet Captiva

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 11.0 37% or 6.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 79.5 mm 4% or 3.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 80.5 mm 13% or 11.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

148 bhp vs 133 bhp

110 kw. vs 98 kw.

10% or 15 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 160 nM 50% or 160 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 39.2 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 8% or 3.02 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 45.56 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 11% or 4.87 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 465 liters vs 165 liters 65% or 300 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 40 liters 38% or 25 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2505 kg vs 1430 kg 43% or 1075 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 735 kg vs 381 kg 48% or 354 kg
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

9 reasons to buy Renault Twingo

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.7 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 2.1 sec.
More top speed 125 mph vs 114 mph 11 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (City) 31.38 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 2% or 0.73 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 96 g/mile vs 119 g/mile 24% or 23 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 959 liters vs 930 liters 3% or 29 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Other specs
Less weight 1049 kg vs 1770 kg 69% or 721 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.4 meters vs 11.5 meters 11% or 1.1 meters

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Captiva vs. Renault Twingo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6750 RPM 41% or 2750 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1598 cm3 20% or 393 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Service cycle
Service interval 12 months vs 24 months 50% or 12 months
Dimensions
Length 4635 mm vs 3607 mm 22% or 1028 mm shorter
Width 1850 mm vs 1688 mm 9% or 162 mm wider
Height 1720 mm vs 1460 mm 15% or 260 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2705 mm vs 2368 mm 12% or 337 mm more
Front tires size 215/70 R16 vs 195/40 R17
Rear tires size 215/70 R16 vs 195/40 R17
Spare wheel Compact vs 195/40 R17
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)