Last Update: May. 23, 2019, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Captiva and Rolls-Royce Ghost

What is Better Chevrolet Captiva or Rolls-Royce Ghost?

Exterior

Chevrolet Captiva Rolls-Royce Ghost

6 reasons to buy Chevrolet Captiva

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 10.0 43% or 7.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 88.3 mm 4% or 3.7 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 119 g/mile vs 197 g/mile 66% or 78 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 735 kg vs 580 kg 21% or 155 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1770 kg vs 2360 kg 33% or 590 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.5 meters vs 13.4 meters 17% or 1.9 meters

12 reasons to buy Rolls-Royce Ghost

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 12 vs 4 8 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 89 mm vs 83 mm 7% or 6 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

563 bhp vs 148 bhp

420 kw. vs 110 kw.

74% or 415 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 780 nM vs 320 nM 59% or 460 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.7 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 6.1 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 114 mph 41 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 20.79 mpg vs 39.2 mpg 89% or 18.41 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 29.39 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 55% or 16.17 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 13.8 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 133% or 18.31 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 490 liters vs 465 liters 5% or 25 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2940 kg vs 2505 kg 15% or 435 kg

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Captiva vs. Rolls-Royce Ghost

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5250 RPM 24% or 1250 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 6592 cm3 70% or 4601 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V12
Camshaft SOHC vs QUAD CAM
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 8 3 less
Dimensions
Length 4635 mm vs 5399 mm 14% or 764 mm shorter
Width 1850 mm vs 1948 mm 5% or 98 mm narrower
Height 1720 mm vs 1550 mm 10% or 170 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2705 mm vs 3295 mm 18% or 590 mm less
Front tires size 215/70 R16 vs 255/50 R19
Rear tires size 215/70 R16 vs 255/50 R19
Spare wheel Compact vs flat tires
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 19" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)