Last Update: Jun. 15, 2019, 5:59 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Captiva and Rover CityRover

What is Better Chevrolet Captiva or Rover CityRover?

Exterior

Chevrolet Captiva Rover CityRover

15 reasons to buy Chevrolet Captiva

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Better compression 17.5 vs 10.0 43% or 7.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 75 mm 10% or 8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 79.5 mm 14% or 12.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

148 bhp vs 85 bhp

110 kw. vs 62 kw.

43% or 63 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 120 nM 63% or 200 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.8 sec. vs 11.9 sec. 1.1 sec.
More top speed 114 mph vs 100 mph 14 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 45.56 mpg vs 46.64 mpg 2% or 1.08 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 465 liters vs 220 liters 53% or 245 liters
More maximum trunk space 930 liters vs 610 liters 34% or 320 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 37 liters 43% or 28 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2505 kg vs 1440 kg 43% or 1065 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 735 kg vs 400 kg 46% or 335 kg

5 reasons to buy Rover CityRover

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 37.88 mpg vs 39.2 mpg 3% or 1.32 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 28.5 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 13% or 3.61 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 104 g/mile vs 119 g/mile 14% or 15 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1040 kg vs 1770 kg 70% or 730 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.8 meters vs 11.5 meters 17% or 1.7 meters

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Captiva vs. Rover CityRover

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5500 RPM 27% or 1500 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1405 cm3 29% or 586 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4635 mm vs 3703 mm 20% or 932 mm shorter
Width 1850 mm vs 1620 mm 12% or 230 mm wider
Height 1720 mm vs 1500 mm 13% or 220 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2705 mm vs 2400 mm 11% or 305 mm more
Front tires size 215/70 R16 vs 175/60 R14
Rear tires size 215/70 R16 vs 175/60 R14
Spare wheel Compact vs 175/50 R14
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 14" SPORT alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)