Last Update: Mar. 24, 2019, 5:36 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Citroen C3 Pluriel

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Citroen C3 Pluriel?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Citroen C3 Pluriel

18 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Better compression 17.5 vs 10.5 40% or 7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 75 mm 10% or 8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 77 mm 16% or 15 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 75 bhp

110 kw. vs 55 kw.

50% or 75 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 117 nM 63% or 203 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 13.9 sec. 4.2 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 99 mph 25 mph
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 480 liters vs 266 liters 45% or 214 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 47 liters 28% or 18 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2045 kg vs 1513 kg 26% or 532 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 485 kg vs 355 kg 27% or 130 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 700 kg vs 34 kg 95% or 666 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1200 kg vs 800 kg 33% or 400 kg
Warranty
More timing belt warranty - Mileage 62150 miles vs 12430 miles 80% or 49720 miles
Service cycle
More timing belt replacement interval 72 months vs 24 months 67% or 48 months
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11.29 meters 5% or 0.49 meters
More seats 5 vs 4 1

7 reasons to buy Citroen C3 Pluriel

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 41.48 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 12% or 4.79 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 52.33 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 2% or 0.94 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 31.01 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 22% or 6.69 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 99 g/mile vs 105 g/mile 6% or 6 g/mile
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Service cycle
More service interval - Mileage 18645 miles vs 9323 miles 50% or 9322 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1158 kg vs 1560 kg 35% or 402 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Citroen C3 Pluriel

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5400 RPM 26% or 1400 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1360 cm3 32% or 631 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Service cycle
Service interval 12 months vs 24 months 50% or 12 months
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 3934 mm 18% or 871 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1700 mm 6% or 110 mm wider
Height 1450 mm vs 1563 mm 7% or 113 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2460 mm 9% or 240 mm more
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 185/65 R15
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 185/65 R15
Spare wheel Compact vs Compact
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)