Last Update: May. 21, 2019, 5:19 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Honda HR-V

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Honda HR-V?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Honda HR-V

13 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 9.6 45% or 7.9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 75 mm 10% or 8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 90 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 105 bhp

110 kw. vs 77 kw.

30% or 45 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 135 nM 58% or 185 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 13.2 sec. 3.5 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 94 mph 30 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 125 g/mile 19% or 20 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 480 liters vs 285 liters 41% or 195 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 55 liters 15% or 10 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 700 kg vs 500 kg 29% or 200 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1200 kg vs 800 kg 33% or 400 kg

5 reasons to buy Honda HR-V

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 33.62 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 38% or 12.65 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 37.22 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 43% or 16.05 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 27.19 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 39% or 10.51 mpg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 93226 miles vs 62150 miles 33% or 31076 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1291 kg vs 1560 kg 21% or 269 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Honda HR-V

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6200 RPM 35% or 2200 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1590 cm3 20% or 401 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4010 mm 17% or 795 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1695 mm 6% or 115 mm wider
Height 1450 mm vs 1700 mm 15% or 250 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2350 mm 13% or 350 mm more
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 205/60 R16
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 205/60 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs Compact
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16 x 6JJ alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)