Last Update: Mar. 22, 2019, 5:39 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Hyundai Tucson

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Hyundai Tucson?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Hyundai Tucson

9 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 17.3 1% or 0.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 138 bhp

110 kw. vs 103 kw.

8% or 12 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 305 nM 5% or 15 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 12.8 sec. 3.1 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 109 mph 15 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 131 g/mile 25% or 26 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 58 liters 11% or 7 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 700 kg vs 500 kg 29% or 200 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1560 kg vs 1625 kg 4% or 65 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

10 reasons to buy Hyundai Tucson

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 35.28 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 31% or 10.99 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.83 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 24% or 10.44 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 27.41 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 38% or 10.29 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 540 liters vs 480 liters 11% or 60 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2190 kg vs 2045 kg 7% or 145 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 565 kg vs 485 kg 14% or 80 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1400 kg vs 1200 kg 14% or 200 kg
Warranty
More painted surfaces warranty 5 years vs 3 years 40% or 2 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
More standard warranty - Years 5 years vs 3 years 40% or 2 years

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Hyundai Tucson

Engine and transmission
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 4 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4325 mm 10% or 480 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1795 mm 1% or 15 mm wider
Height 1450 mm vs 1680 mm 14% or 230 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2630 mm 3% or 70 mm more
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 215/65 R16
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 215/65 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs 215/65 R16
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 6 spokes vs 5 spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)