Last Update: Mar. 22, 2019, 5:39 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Kia Shuma

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Kia Shuma?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Kia Shuma

10 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 78 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 78.4 mm 15% or 13.6 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 87 bhp

110 kw. vs 65 kw.

42% or 63 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 135 nM 58% or 185 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 13.2 sec. 3.5 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 112 mph 12 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 115 g/mile 10% or 10 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 50 liters 23% or 15 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 700 kg vs 530 kg 24% or 170 kg

5 reasons to buy Kia Shuma

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 35.81 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 29% or 10.46 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.78 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 19% or 8.49 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 26.91 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 40% or 10.79 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1250 kg vs 1200 kg 4% or 50 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1233 kg vs 1560 kg 27% or 327 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Kia Shuma

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5000 RPM 20% or 1000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1498 cm3 25% or 493 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4475 mm 7% or 330 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1711 mm 5% or 99 mm wider
Height 1450 mm vs 1413 mm 3% or 37 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2560 mm 5% or 140 mm more
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 175/70R13
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 175/70R13
Spare wheel Compact vs 175/70R13
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)