Last Update: May. 19, 2019, 5:11 a.m.
Sizes and Dimensions
Parts & Accessories
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

11 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 11.0 37% or 6.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 81.5 mm 2% or 1.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 127 bhp

110 kw. vs 95 kw.

15% or 23 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 190 nM 41% or 130 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 1.1 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 106 mph 18 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 141 g/mile 34% or 36 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 480 liters vs 358 liters 25% or 122 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 53 liters 18% or 12 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2045 kg vs 1890 kg 8% or 155 kg

9 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 95.8 mm vs 92 mm 4% or 3.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.69 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 56% or 16.58 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 35.28 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 51% or 17.99 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 23.21 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 62% or 14.49 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 500 kg vs 485 kg 3% or 15 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 1200 kg 20% or 300 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1390 kg vs 1560 kg 12% or 170 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.4 meters vs 10.8 meters 4% or 0.4 meters

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5000 RPM 20% or 1000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1999 cm3 0% or 8 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4035 mm 16% or 770 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1695 mm 6% or 115 mm wider
Height 1450 mm vs 1735 mm 16% or 285 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2450 mm 9% or 250 mm more
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 215/65 R16 98S
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 215/65 R16 98S
Spare wheel Compact vs 215/65 R16 98S
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16"X6.0J alloy wheels
Style of wheels 6 spokes vs 5 spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)