Last Update: May. 24, 2019, 5:56 a.m.
Sizes and Dimensions
Parts & Accessories
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Mitsubishi Space Runner

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Mitsubishi Space Runner?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Mitsubishi Space Runner

5 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
More engine power

150 bhp vs 114 bhp

110 kw. vs

24% or 36 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 11.6 sec. 1.9 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 106 mph 18 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 137 g/mile 30% or 32 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 55 liters 15% or 10 liters

3 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Space Runner

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.5 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 57% or 16.77 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1225 kg vs 1560 kg 27% or 335 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 10.8 meters 8% or 0.8 meters

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Mitsubishi Space Runner

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1834 cm3 8% or 157 cm3 more
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Multi-point injection fuel
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4270 mm 11% or 535 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1695 mm 6% or 115 mm wider
Height 1450 mm vs 1625 mm 11% or 175 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2520 mm 7% or 180 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)