Last Update: Mar. 21, 2019, 5:35 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Peugeot 607

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Peugeot 607?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Peugeot 607

7 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 88 mm 4% or 4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 136 bhp

110 kw. vs 100 kw.

9% or 14 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 1.1 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 53.27 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 6% or 3.19 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 485 kg vs 418 kg 14% or 67 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1560 kg vs 1665 kg 7% or 105 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11.4 meters 6% or 0.6 meters

12 reasons to buy Peugeot 607

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 83 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Performance
More top speed 128 mph vs 124 mph 4 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (City) 34.81 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 8% or 2.89 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 101 g/mile vs 105 g/mile 4% or 4 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 509 liters vs 480 liters 6% or 29 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 65 liters 19% or 15 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2083 kg vs 2045 kg 2% or 38 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 700 kg 7% or 50 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1760 kg vs 1200 kg 32% or 560 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
More timing belt warranty - Mileage 87011 miles vs 62150 miles 29% or 24861 miles
Service cycle
More service interval - Mileage 18645 miles vs 9323 miles 50% or 9322 miles

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Peugeot 607

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 0% or 6 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4902 mm 2% or 97 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1826 mm 1% or 16 mm narrower
Height 1450 mm vs 1468 mm 1% or 18 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2800 mm 4% or 100 mm less
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 225/50 R17
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 225/50 R17
Spare wheel Compact vs 225/50 R17
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)