Last Update: Mar. 20, 2019, 5:04 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Peugeot Expert Tepee

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Peugeot Expert Tepee?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Peugeot Expert Tepee

9 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 75 mm 10% or 8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 88.3 mm 4% or 3.7 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 90 bhp

110 kw. vs 66 kw.

40% or 60 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 180 nM 44% or 140 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 18.5 sec. 8.8 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 90 mph 34 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 121 g/mile 15% or 16 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1560 kg vs 1745 kg 12% or 185 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 12.18 meters 13% or 1.38 meters

11 reasons to buy Peugeot Expert Tepee

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 39.2 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 18% or 7.07 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.83 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 24% or 10.44 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 33.62 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 12% or 4.08 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 2163 liters vs 480 liters 78% or 1683 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 65 liters 19% or 15 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2683 kg vs 2045 kg 24% or 638 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 938 kg vs 485 kg 48% or 453 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 700 kg 7% or 50 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1200 kg 40% or 800 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 5 1

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Peugeot Expert Tepee

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1560 cm3 22% or 431 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4806 mm 0% or 1 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1998 mm 9% or 188 mm narrower
Height 1450 mm vs 1934 mm 25% or 484 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 3000 mm 10% or 300 mm less
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 215/60 R16
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 215/60 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs 215/60 R16
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)