Last Update: Mar. 22, 2019, 5:39 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Suzuki Baleno

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Suzuki Baleno?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Suzuki Baleno

12 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 9.5 46% or 8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 75 mm 10% or 8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 90 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 95.8 bhp

110 kw. vs 70.5 kw.

36% or 54.2 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 134 nM 58% or 186 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 11.5 sec. 1.8 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 108 mph 16 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 111 g/mile 6% or 6 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 51 liters 22% or 14 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2045 kg vs 1560 kg 24% or 485 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 700 kg vs 400 kg 43% or 300 kg

5 reasons to buy Suzuki Baleno

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 21% or 8.08 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.78 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 19% or 8.49 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 29.99 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 26% or 7.71 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1035 kg vs 1560 kg 51% or 525 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.8 meters vs 10.8 meters 10% or 1 meters

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Suzuki Baleno

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6000 RPM 33% or 2000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1590 cm3 20% or 401 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4345 mm 10% or 460 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1690 mm 7% or 120 mm wider
Height 1450 mm vs 1460 mm 1% or 10 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2480 mm 8% or 220 mm more
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 175/70 R13 82H
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 175/70 R13 82H
Spare wheel Compact vs 175/70 R13 82H
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 13 X steel
Style of wheels 6 spokes vs covers
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)