Last Update: Mar. 19, 2019, 5:24 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Epica and Toyota Land Cruiser

What is Better Chevrolet Epica or Toyota Land Cruiser?

Exterior

Chevrolet Epica Toyota Land Cruiser

9 reasons to buy Chevrolet Epica

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 9.6 45% or 7.9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 84 mm 9% or 8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.7 sec. vs 11.2 sec. 1.5 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 112 mph 12 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 241 g/mile 130% or 136 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 480 liters vs 9 liters 98% or 471 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1560 kg vs 2495 kg 60% or 935 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11.8 meters 9% or 1 meters

13 reasons to buy Toyota Land Cruiser

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 94 mm vs 83 mm 12% or 11 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

235 bhp vs 150 bhp

173 kw. vs 110 kw.

36% or 85 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 434 nM vs 320 nM 26% or 114 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 17.3 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 167% or 28.97 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 21.11 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 152% or 32.16 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 13.1 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 188% or 24.6 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 96 liters vs 65 liters 32% or 31 liters
More maximum allowable weight 3260 kg vs 2045 kg 37% or 1215 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 765 kg vs 485 kg 37% or 280 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 3500 kg vs 1200 kg 66% or 2300 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 5 2

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Epica vs. Toyota Land Cruiser

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 4800 RPM 17% or 800 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 4664 cm3 57% or 2673 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs V8
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4805 mm vs 4890 mm 2% or 85 mm shorter
Width 1810 mm vs 1940 mm 7% or 130 mm narrower
Height 1450 mm vs 1890 mm 23% or 440 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2850 mm 5% or 150 mm less
Front tires size 205/60 R16 vs 275/60R18
Rear tires size 205/60 R16 vs 275/60R18
Spare wheel Compact vs 275/60R18
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)