Last Update: Aug. 28, 2016, 5:45 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Citroen Berlingo and Renault Kangoo

What is Better Citroen Berlingo or Renault Kangoo?

Exterior

Citroen Berlingo Renault Kangoo

8 reasons to buy Citroen Berlingo

Engine and transmission
More engine power

75 bhp vs 68 bhp

56 kw. vs 50 kw.

9% or 7 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 14.5 sec. vs 19.6 sec. 5.1 sec.
More top speed 94 mph vs 91 mph 3 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 42% or 16.06 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 45.56 mpg vs 57.56 mpg 26% or 12 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 29.39 mpg vs 48.66 mpg 66% or 19.27 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 576 kg vs 565 kg 2% or 11 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1204 kg vs 1389 kg 15% or 185 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

9 reasons to buy Renault Kangoo

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 76 mm vs 75 mm 1% or 1 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 80.5 mm vs 77 mm 4% or 3.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 185 nM vs 121 nM 35% or 64 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 109 g/mile 27% or 23 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 55 liters 8% or 5 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1954 kg vs 1780 kg 9% or 174 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 732 kg vs 500 kg 32% or 232 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1002 kg vs 900 kg 10% or 102 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.7 meters vs 11.3 meters 6% or 0.6 meters

Neutral reasons Citroen Berlingo vs. Renault Kangoo

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1360 cm3 vs 1461 cm3 7% or 101 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4137 mm vs 4213 mm 2% or 76 mm shorter
Width 1724 mm vs 1829 mm 6% or 105 mm narrower
Height 1819 mm vs 1839 mm 1% or 20 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2693 mm vs 2697 mm 0% or 4 mm less
Front tires size 185/65 R15 vs 195/65 R15
Rear tires size 185/65 R15 vs 195/65 R15
Spare wheel 185/65 R15 vs 195/65 R15
Type of wheels 15" steel vs 15" steel
Heads up! Have a question or found a bug? Please let us know
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)