Last Update: Mar. 25, 2019, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Elise and Nissan Almera Tino

What is Better Lotus Elise or Nissan Almera Tino?

Exterior

Lotus Elise Nissan Almera Tino

10 reasons to buy Lotus Elise

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.5 vs 9.5 10% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 89.3 mm vs 88 mm 1% or 1.3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 115 bhp

90 kw. vs 85 kw.

4% or 5 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 168 nM vs 163 nM 3% or 5 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.7 sec. vs 11.6 sec. 5.9 sec.
More top speed 126 mph vs 107 mph 19 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 110 g/mile vs 114 g/mile 4% or 4 g/mile
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 785 kg vs 1305 kg 66% or 520 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

12 reasons to buy Nissan Almera Tino

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 36.7 mpg vs 38.5 mpg 5% or 1.8 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.78 mpg vs 46 mpg 3% or 1.22 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 28.2 mpg vs 29.99 mpg 6% or 1.79 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 72 dB vs 74 dB 3% or 2 dB
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 850 liters vs 115 liters 86% or 735 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 32 liters 47% or 28 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1830 kg vs 1072 kg 41% or 758 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 525 kg vs 287 kg 45% or 238 kg
Warranty
More painted surfaces warranty 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 10.7 meters 1% or 0.1 meters
More seats 5 vs 2 3

Neutral reasons Lotus Elise vs. Nissan Almera Tino

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1796 cm3 vs 1769 cm3 2% or 27 cm3 more
Engine position Mid transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 3785 mm vs 4264 mm 11% or 479 mm shorter
Width 1719 mm vs 1758 mm 2% or 39 mm narrower
Height 1143 mm vs 1608 mm 29% or 465 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2300 mm vs 2535 mm 9% or 235 mm less
Front tires size 175/55 R16V vs 185/65 R15
Rear tires size 225/45 R17V vs 185/65 R15
Spare wheel INFLATOR vs 185/65 R15
Type of wheels 16" FR 17" R alloy wheels vs 6JX15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)