Last Update: Mar. 18, 2019, 5:01 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Esprit and Peugeot 607

What is Better Lotus Esprit or Peugeot 607?

Exterior

Lotus Esprit Peugeot 607

11 reasons to buy Lotus Esprit

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

350 bhp vs 136 bhp

260 kw. vs 100 kw.

61% or 214 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 400 nM vs 320 nM 20% or 80 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.8 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 6 sec.
More top speed 170 mph vs 128 mph 42 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 21.24 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 118% or 25.03 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 30.33 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 86% or 26.13 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 14.12 mpg vs 34.81 mpg 147% or 20.69 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 74 dB vs 74.6 dB 1% or 0.59999999999999 dB
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1380 kg vs 1665 kg 21% or 285 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

8 reasons to buy Peugeot 607

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 83 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 88 mm vs 81 mm 8% or 7 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 101 g/mile vs 204 g/mile 102% or 103 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 73 liters 9% or 7 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 2 3

Neutral reasons Lotus Esprit vs. Peugeot 607

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6500 RPM vs 4000 RPM 38% or 2500 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3506 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 43% or 1509 cm3 more
Engine position Mid-mounted vs Front transverse
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection twin-turbo vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4369 mm vs 4902 mm 11% or 533 mm shorter
Width 1883 mm vs 1826 mm 3% or 57 mm wider
Height 1150 mm vs 1468 mm 22% or 318 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 235/40 ZR17 vs 225/50 R17
Rear tires size 285/35 ZR18 vs 225/50 R17
Spare wheel Compact (saving space) vs 225/50 R17
Type of wheels Front 8.5J/black 10J vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)