Last Update: Mar. 20, 2019, 5:04 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Europa and Nissan Qashqai

What is Better Lotus Europa or Nissan Qashqai?

Exterior

Lotus Europa Nissan Qashqai

11 reasons to buy Lotus Europa

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 76 mm 12% or 10 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 80.5 mm 6% or 5.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

197 bhp vs 106 bhp

147 kw. vs 78 kw.

46% or 91 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 272 nM vs 240 nM 12% or 32 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.9 sec. vs 12.2 sec. 6.3 sec.
More top speed 150 mph vs 108 mph 42 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 30.41 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 78% or 23.84 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 38.88 mpg vs 58.85 mpg 51% or 19.97 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.99 mpg vs 47.11 mpg 114% or 25.12 mpg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

7 reasons to buy Nissan Qashqai

Engine and transmission
Better compression 15.3 vs 8.6 44% or 6.7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 137 g/mile 59% or 51 g/mile
Less noise level 69 dB vs 74 dB 7% or 5 dB
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 410 liters vs 154 liters 62% or 256 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 43.5 liters 33% or 21.5 liters
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 2 3

Neutral reasons Lotus Europa vs. Nissan Qashqai

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 4000 RPM 26% or 1400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1461 cm3 27% or 537 cm3 more
Engine position Mid transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection with turbocharging vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 3900 mm vs 4315 mm 10% or 415 mm shorter
Width 1714 mm vs 1780 mm 4% or 66 mm narrower
Height 1120 mm vs 1615 mm 31% or 495 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2330 mm vs 2630 mm 11% or 300 mm less
Front tires size 175/55 R17 vs 215/60 R17
Rear tires size 225/45 R17 vs 215/60 R17
Spare wheel spray for repair vs Compact
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)