Last Update: May. 24, 2019, 5:56 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Europa and Peugeot Expert Tepee

What is Better Lotus Europa or Peugeot Expert Tepee?

Exterior

Lotus Europa Peugeot Expert Tepee

11 reasons to buy Lotus Europa

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 75 mm 13% or 11 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

197 bhp vs 90 bhp

147 kw. vs 66 kw.

54% or 107 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 272 nM vs 180 nM 34% or 92 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.9 sec. vs 18.5 sec. 12.6 sec.
More top speed 150 mph vs 90 mph 60 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 30.41 mpg vs 39.2 mpg 29% or 8.79 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 38.88 mpg vs 42.83 mpg 10% or 3.95 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.99 mpg vs 33.62 mpg 53% or 11.63 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 74 dB vs 74.4 dB 1% or 0.40000000000001 dB
Warranty
More painted surfaces warranty 8 years vs 3 years 63% or 5 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

6 reasons to buy Peugeot Expert Tepee

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 88.3 mm vs 86 mm 3% or 2.3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 121 g/mile vs 137 g/mile 13% or 16 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 2163 liters vs 154 liters 93% or 2009 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 43.5 liters 46% or 36.5 liters
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 2 4

Neutral reasons Lotus Europa vs. Peugeot Expert Tepee

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 4000 RPM 26% or 1400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1560 cm3 22% or 438 cm3 more
Engine position Mid transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection with turbocharging vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 3900 mm vs 4806 mm 19% or 906 mm shorter
Width 1714 mm vs 1998 mm 14% or 284 mm narrower
Height 1120 mm vs 1934 mm 42% or 814 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2330 mm vs 3000 mm 22% or 670 mm less
Front tires size 175/55 R17 vs 215/60 R16
Rear tires size 225/45 R17 vs 215/60 R16
Spare wheel spray for repair vs 215/60 R16
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 16" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)