Last Update: May. 26, 2019, 5:47 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Exige and Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

What is Better Lotus Exige or Mitsubishi Lancer Evo?

Exterior

Lotus Exige Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

4 reasons to buy Lotus Exige

Engine and transmission
Better compression 11.5 vs 9.0 22% or 2.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 129 g/mile vs 153 g/mile 19% or 24 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 875 kg vs 1560 kg 78% or 685 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.7 meters vs 11.8 meters 10% or 1.1 meters

14 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 82 mm 5% or 4 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 85 mm 1% or 1 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

290 bhp vs 189 bhp

217 kw. vs 141 kw.

35% or 101 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 407 nM vs 181 nM 56% or 226 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.7 sec. vs 5.2 sec. 0.5 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 27.41 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 17% or 4.7 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 34.91 mpg vs 41.48 mpg 19% or 6.57 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 19.9 mpg vs 23.3 mpg 17% or 3.4 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 55 liters vs 40 liters 27% or 15 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2040 kg vs 1166 kg 43% or 874 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 480 kg vs 291 kg 39% or 189 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 2 3

Neutral reasons Lotus Exige vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 7800 RPM vs 6500 RPM 17% or 1300 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1796 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 10% or 202 cm3 less
Engine position Mid transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC VVT
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Turbocharged and intercooled
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 3797 mm vs 4495 mm 16% or 698 mm shorter
Width 1727 mm vs 1810 mm 5% or 83 mm narrower
Height 1159 mm vs 1480 mm 22% or 321 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2300 mm vs 2650 mm 13% or 350 mm less
Front tires size 195/50 R16 vs 245/40 R18
Rear tires size 225/45 R17 vs 245/40 R18
Spare wheel spray for repair vs kit for wheel pumping
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 16 spokes vs ENKEI
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)