Last Update: May. 20, 2019, 5:16 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Exige and Mitsubishi Pajero

What is Better Lotus Exige or Mitsubishi Pajero?

Exterior

Lotus Exige Mitsubishi Pajero

6 reasons to buy Lotus Exige

Engine and transmission
More engine power

189 bhp vs 158 bhp

141 kw. vs 118 kw.

16% or 31 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.2 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 6.5 sec.
More top speed 147 mph vs 110 mph 37 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (City) 23.3 mpg vs 24.79 mpg 6% or 1.49 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 129 g/mile vs 152 g/mile 18% or 23 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 875 kg vs 2085 kg 138% or 1210 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

14 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Pajero

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 11.5 32% or 5.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 98.5 mm vs 82 mm 17% or 16.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 105 mm vs 85 mm 19% or 20 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 381 nM vs 181 nM 52% or 200 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 30.69 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 5% or 1.42 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 35.81 mpg vs 41.48 mpg 16% or 5.67 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 73.5 dB vs 74 dB 1% or 0.5 dB
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 69 liters vs 40 liters 42% or 29 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2665 kg vs 1166 kg 56% or 1499 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 580 kg vs 291 kg 50% or 289 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 10.7 meters 1% or 0.1 meters
More seats 5 vs 2 3

Neutral reasons Lotus Exige vs. Mitsubishi Pajero

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 7800 RPM vs 3800 RPM 51% or 4000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1796 cm3 vs 3200 cm3 44% or 1404 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 3797 mm vs 4385 mm 13% or 588 mm shorter
Width 1727 mm vs 1875 mm 8% or 148 mm narrower
Height 1159 mm vs 1880 mm 38% or 721 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2300 mm vs 2545 mm 10% or 245 mm less
Front tires size 195/50 R16 vs 265/65 R17
Rear tires size 225/45 R17 vs 265/65 R17
Spare wheel spray for repair vs 265/65 R17
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)