Last Update: Mar. 25, 2019, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Exige and Skoda Roomster

What is Better Lotus Exige or Skoda Roomster?

Exterior

Lotus Exige Skoda Roomster

13 reasons to buy Lotus Exige

Engine and transmission
Better compression 19.5 vs 11.5 41% or 8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 85 mm 11% or 10.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 129 g/mile 50% or 43 g/mile
Less noise level 71 dB vs 74 dB 4% or 3 dB
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 450 liters vs 112 liters 75% or 338 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 55 liters vs 40 liters 27% or 15 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1745 kg vs 1166 kg 33% or 579 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 515 kg vs 291 kg 43% or 224 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 10 years vs 8 years 20% or 2 years
More painted surfaces warranty 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.5 meters vs 10.7 meters 2% or 0.2 meters
More seats 5 vs 2 3

12 reasons to buy Skoda Roomster

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 4 vs 3 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston diameter larger 82 mm vs 79.5 mm 3% or 2.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

189 bhp vs 70 bhp

141 kw. vs 51 kw.

63% or 119 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 181 nM vs 155 nM 14% or 26 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.2 sec. vs 16.5 sec. 11.3 sec.
More top speed 147 mph vs 98 mph 49 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.11 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 66% or 21.16 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 41.48 mpg vs 62.77 mpg 51% or 21.29 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 23.3 mpg vs 44.11 mpg 89% or 20.81 mpg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 875 kg vs 1230 kg 41% or 355 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Lotus Exige vs. Skoda Roomster

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 7800 RPM 49% or 3800 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1422 cm3 vs 1796 cm3 21% or 374 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Mid transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection with turbocharging vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4205 mm vs 3797 mm 10% or 408 mm shorter
Width 1684 mm vs 1727 mm 2% or 43 mm narrower
Height 1607 mm vs 1159 mm 28% or 448 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2617 mm vs 2300 mm 12% or 317 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 R15 vs 195/50 R16
Rear tires size 195/55 R15 vs 225/45 R17
Spare wheel 195/55 R15 vs spray for repair
Type of wheels 15" steel vs 17" alloy wheels
Style of wheels Hermes vs 16 spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)