Last Update: May. 26, 2019, 5:47 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Exige and Toyota Picnic

What is Better Lotus Exige or Toyota Picnic?

Exterior

Lotus Exige Toyota Picnic

10 reasons to buy Lotus Exige

Engine and transmission
Better compression 11.5 vs 9.5 17% or 2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More engine power

189 bhp vs 126 bhp

141 kw. vs 94 kw.

33% or 63 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 181 nM vs 178 nM 2% or 3 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.2 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 6.5 sec.
More top speed 147 mph vs 109 mph 38 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 129 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 10% or 13 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 875 kg vs 1440 kg 65% or 565 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

10 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 82 mm 5% or 4 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 85 mm 1% or 1 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 10% or 3.01 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 41.48 mpg 15% or 5.28 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 23.3 mpg 7% or 1.61 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 182 liters vs 112 liters 38% or 70 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 40 liters 33% or 20 liters
Warranty
More painted surfaces warranty 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 2 4

Neutral reasons Lotus Exige vs. Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 7800 RPM vs 5400 RPM 31% or 2400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1796 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 10% or 202 cm3 less
Engine position Mid transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 4 2 more
Dimensions
Length 3797 mm vs 4530 mm 16% or 733 mm shorter
Width 1727 mm vs 1695 mm 2% or 32 mm wider
Height 1159 mm vs 1660 mm 30% or 501 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/50 R16 vs 195/65R14
Rear tires size 225/45 R17 vs 195/65R14
Spare wheel spray for repair vs 195/65R14 steel
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 14 alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)