Last Update: Mar. 18, 2019, 5:01 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Mazda CX-9

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Mazda CX-9?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Mazda CX-9

9 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 6 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 273 bhp

271 kw. vs 198 kw.

26% or 97 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 366 nM 25% or 125 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 10.10 sec. 5 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 112 mph 62 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.1 mpg vs 21.99 mpg 21% or 3.89 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.4 mpg vs 28.99 mpg 10% or 2.59 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 15 mpg 27% or 3.2 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1590 kg vs 2040 kg 28% or 450 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

3 reasons to buy Mazda CX-9

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 192 g/mile vs 230 g/mile 20% or 38 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum allowable weight 2712 kg vs 2050 kg 24% or 662 kg

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Mazda CX-9

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 3217 cm3 vs 3726 cm3 14% or 509 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4510 mm vs 5089 mm 11% or 579 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 1936 mm 6% or 114 mm narrower
Height 1305 mm vs 1728 mm 24% or 423 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2660 mm vs 2875 mm 7% or 215 mm less
Front tires size 235/40 ZR18 vs 245/50R20
Rear tires size 238/35 ZR18 vs 245/50R20
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)