Last Update: May. 25, 2019, 5:11 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Mercedes-Benz CLC

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Mercedes-Benz CLC?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Mercedes-Benz CLC

10 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 143 bhp

271 kw. vs 105 kw.

61% or 227 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 220 nM 55% or 271 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 9.7 sec. 4.6 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 137 mph 37 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.1 mpg vs 37.22 mpg 106% or 19.12 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.4 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 73% or 19.16 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 27.7 mpg 135% or 15.9 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 90 liters vs 62 liters 31% or 28 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2050 kg vs 1945 kg 5% or 105 kg

8 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz CLC

Engine and transmission
Better compression 9.3 vs 8.0 14% or 1.3 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 82 mm vs 80 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 85 mm vs 80 mm 6% or 5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 113 g/mile vs 230 g/mile 104% or 117 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 30 years vs 2 years 93% or 28 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1475 kg vs 1590 kg 8% or 115 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Mercedes-Benz CLC

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6250 RPM vs 5200 RPM 17% or 1050 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3217 cm3 vs 1796 cm3 44% or 1421 cm3 more
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs With a mechanical supercharger
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4510 mm vs 4448 mm 1% or 62 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 1728 mm 5% or 94 mm wider
Height 1305 mm vs 1405 mm 7% or 100 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2660 mm vs 2715 mm 2% or 55 mm less
Front tires size 235/40 ZR18 vs 225/40 R18
Rear tires size 238/35 ZR18 vs 245/35 R18
Spare wheel 235/40 ZR18 vs Compact
Type of wheels 18 alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 10 spokes alloy wheels vs 5 double spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)