Last Update: Mar. 25, 2019, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Mitsubishi ASX

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Mitsubishi ASX?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Mitsubishi ASX

11 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 80 mm vs 75 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 115 bhp

271 kw. vs 86 kw.

69% or 255 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 154 nM 69% or 337 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 11.4 sec. 6.3 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 113 mph 61 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.1 mpg vs 47.11 mpg 160% or 29.01 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.4 mpg vs 56.73 mpg 115% or 30.33 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 36.7 mpg 211% or 24.9 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 90 liters vs 63 liters 30% or 27 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2050 kg vs 1870 kg 9% or 180 kg

8 reasons to buy Mitsubishi ASX

Engine and transmission
Better compression 11.0 vs 8.0 27% or 3 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 80 mm 11% or 10 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 84 g/mile vs 230 g/mile 174% or 146 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 2 years 83% or 10 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1270 kg vs 1590 kg 25% or 320 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Mitsubishi ASX

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6250 RPM vs 6000 RPM 4% or 250 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3217 cm3 vs 1590 cm3 51% or 1627 cm3 more
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4510 mm vs 4295 mm 5% or 215 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 1770 mm 3% or 52 mm wider
Height 1305 mm vs 1615 mm 19% or 310 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2660 mm vs 2670 mm 0% or 10 mm less
Front tires size 235/40 ZR18 vs 215/65 R16
Rear tires size 238/35 ZR18 vs 215/65 R16
Spare wheel 235/40 ZR18 vs repair kit
Type of wheels 18 alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)