Last Update: May. 20, 2019, 5:16 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Mitsubishi Lancer

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Mitsubishi Lancer?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Mitsubishi Lancer

11 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 237 bhp

271 kw. vs 177 kw.

36% or 133 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 343 nM 30% or 148 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 7.1 sec. 2 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 136 mph 38 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.1 mpg vs 27.7 mpg 53% or 9.6 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.4 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 32% or 8.51 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 20.29 mpg 72% or 8.49 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 90 liters vs 55 liters 39% or 35 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2050 kg vs 2045 kg 0% or 5 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1590 kg vs 1595 kg 0% or 5 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

8 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Lancer

Engine and transmission
Better compression 9.0 vs 8.0 11% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 80 mm 7% or 6 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 80 mm 7% or 6 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 151 g/mile vs 230 g/mile 52% or 79 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 2 years 83% or 10 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Mitsubishi Lancer

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6250 RPM vs 6000 RPM 4% or 250 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3217 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 38% or 1219 cm3 more
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Turbocharged and intercooled
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4510 mm vs 4585 mm 2% or 75 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 1760 mm 3% or 62 mm wider
Height 1305 mm vs 1515 mm 14% or 210 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2660 mm vs 2635 mm 1% or 25 mm more
Front tires size 235/40 ZR18 vs 215/45 R18
Rear tires size 238/35 ZR18 vs 215/45 R18
Spare wheel 235/40 ZR18 vs Compact
Type of wheels 18 alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)