Last Update: May. 26, 2019, 5:47 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Mitsubishi Space Star

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Mitsubishi Space Star

11 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 80 mm vs 71 mm 11% or 9 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 81 bhp

271 kw. vs 60 kw.

78% or 289 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 120 nM 76% or 371 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 14.2 sec. 9.1 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 106 mph 68 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.1 mpg vs 41.48 mpg 129% or 23.38 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.4 mpg vs 49.58 mpg 88% or 23.18 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 172% or 20.31 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 90 liters vs 55 liters 39% or 35 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2050 kg vs 1655 kg 19% or 395 kg

9 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Space Star

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.0 vs 8.0 20% or 2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 82 mm vs 80 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 101 g/mile vs 230 g/mile 128% or 129 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Less noise level 73 dB vs 74 dB 1% or 1 dB
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 6 years vs 2 years 67% or 4 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1160 kg vs 1590 kg 37% or 430 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Mitsubishi Space Star

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6250 RPM vs 5000 RPM 20% or 1250 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3217 cm3 vs 1299 cm3 60% or 1918 cm3 more
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs SOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4510 mm vs 4050 mm 10% or 460 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 1715 mm 6% or 107 mm wider
Height 1305 mm vs 1515 mm 14% or 210 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2660 mm vs 2500 mm 6% or 160 mm more
Front tires size 235/40 ZR18 vs 195/55 R15
Rear tires size 238/35 ZR18 vs 195/55 R15
Spare wheel 235/40 ZR18 vs 195/55 R15
Type of wheels 18 alloy wheels vs 15 X 6J
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)