Last Update: May. 24, 2019, 5:56 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Peugeot RCZ

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Peugeot RCZ?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Peugeot RCZ

12 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 80 mm vs 77 mm 4% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 156 bhp

271 kw. vs 115 kw.

58% or 214 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 240 nM 51% or 251 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 8.3 sec. 3.2 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 133 mph 41 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.1 mpg vs 42.07 mpg 132% or 23.97 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.4 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 105% or 27.85 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 30.3 mpg 157% or 18.5 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 90 liters vs 55 liters 39% or 35 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2050 kg vs 1726 kg 16% or 324 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

7 reasons to buy Peugeot RCZ

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 85.8 mm vs 80 mm 7% or 5.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 96 g/mile vs 230 g/mile 140% or 134 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 2 years 83% or 10 years
More painted surfaces warranty 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1394 kg vs 1590 kg 14% or 196 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Peugeot RCZ

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6250 RPM vs 5800 RPM 7% or 450 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3217 cm3 vs 1598 cm3 50% or 1619 cm3 more
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4510 mm vs 4290 mm 5% or 220 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 2107 mm 14% or 285 mm narrower
Height 1305 mm vs 1352 mm 3% or 47 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 235/40 ZR18 vs 235/45 R18
Rear tires size 238/35 ZR18 vs 235/45 R18
Spare wheel 235/40 ZR18 vs repair kit
Type of wheels 18 alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 10 spokes alloy wheels vs ORIGINAL
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)