Last Update: Mar. 19, 2019, 5:24 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

9 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 12 vs 8 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 10.0 vs 8.0 20% or 2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 80 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 16 mpg vs 18.1 mpg 13% or 2.1 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 22.1 mpg vs 26.4 mpg 19% or 4.3 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.1 mpg vs 11.8 mpg 6% or 0.7 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 100 liters vs 90 liters 10% or 10 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2810 kg vs 2050 kg 27% or 760 kg
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

8 reasons to buy Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston stroke longer 80 mm vs 79 mm 1% or 1 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 322 bhp

271 kw. vs 240 kw.

13% or 48 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 490 nM 0% or 1 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 7.1 sec. 2 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 140 mph 34 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 230 g/mile vs 252 g/mile 10% or 22 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1590 kg vs 2350 kg 48% or 760 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 6250 RPM 20% or 1250 less rpms.
Engine capacity 5379 cm3 vs 3217 cm3 40% or 2162 cm3 more
Cylinders location V12 vs V8
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 5390 mm vs 4510 mm 16% or 880 mm shorter
Width 1930 mm vs 1822 mm 6% or 108 mm wider
Height 1515 mm vs 1305 mm 14% or 210 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 3116 mm vs 2660 mm 15% or 456 mm more
Front tires size 235/65 WR16 vs 235/40 ZR18
Rear tires size 235/65 WR16 vs 238/35 ZR18
Spare wheel 235/65 WR16 vs 235/40 ZR18
Type of wheels 7.0J X 16 vs 18 alloy wheels
Style of wheels alloy wheels aluminum spokes vs 10 spokes alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)