Last Update: May. 24, 2019, 5:56 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Suzuki Liana

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Suzuki Liana?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Suzuki Liana

12 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 80 mm vs 78 mm 3% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 105 bhp

271 kw. vs 78 kw.

72% or 265 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 143 nM 71% or 348 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 6.6 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 109 mph 65 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.1 mpg vs 40.9 mpg 126% or 22.8 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.4 mpg vs 48.66 mpg 84% or 22.26 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 172% or 20.31 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 90 liters vs 50 liters 44% or 40 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2050 kg vs 1670 kg 19% or 380 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

7 reasons to buy Suzuki Liana

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.5 vs 8.0 24% or 2.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 83 mm vs 80 mm 4% or 3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 105 g/mile vs 230 g/mile 119% or 125 g/mile
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 2 years 83% or 10 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1220 kg vs 1590 kg 30% or 370 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Suzuki Liana

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6250 RPM vs 5500 RPM 12% or 750 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3217 cm3 vs 1586 cm3 51% or 1631 cm3 more
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4510 mm vs 4350 mm 4% or 160 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 1720 mm 6% or 102 mm wider
Height 1305 mm vs 1545 mm 16% or 240 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2660 mm vs 2480 mm 7% or 180 mm more
Front tires size 235/40 ZR18 vs 185/65R14
Rear tires size 238/35 ZR18 vs 185/65R14
Spare wheel 235/40 ZR18 vs 185/65R14
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)