Last Update: May. 19, 2019, 5:11 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati Gran Cabriolet and Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

What is Better Maserati Gran Cabriolet or Mitsubishi Lancer Evo?

Exterior

Maserati Gran Cabriolet Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

10 reasons to buy Maserati Gran Cabriolet

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 11.3 vs 9.0 20% or 2.3 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 94 mm vs 86 mm 9% or 8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

440 bhp vs 290 bhp

323 kw. vs 217 kw.

34% or 150 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 490 nM vs 407 nM 17% or 83 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.5 mpg vs 27.41 mpg 48% or 8.91 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 27.19 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 28% or 7.72 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 19.9 mpg 69% or 8.1 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 75 liters vs 55 liters 27% or 20 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2280 kg vs 2040 kg 11% or 240 kg

8 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 84.5 mm 2% or 1.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.7 sec. vs 5.4 sec. 0.7 sec.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 153 g/mile vs 220 g/mile 44% or 67 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 480 kg vs 300 kg 38% or 180 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 2 years 83% or 10 years
Other specs
Less weight 1560 kg vs 1980 kg 27% or 420 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.8 meters vs 12.3 meters 4% or 0.5 meters
More seats 5 vs 4 1

Neutral reasons Maserati Gran Cabriolet vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 7000 RPM vs 6500 RPM 7% or 500 more rpms.
Engine capacity 4691 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 57% or 2693 cm3 more
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs DOHC VVT
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Turbocharged and intercooled
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4881 mm vs 4495 mm 8% or 386 mm shorter
Width 1915 mm vs 1810 mm 5% or 105 mm wider
Height 1353 mm vs 1480 mm 9% or 127 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2942 mm vs 2650 mm 10% or 292 mm more
Front tires size 245/40 R20 vs 245/40 R18
Rear tires size 285/40 R20 vs 245/40 R18
Spare wheel puncture repair kit vs kit for wheel pumping
Type of wheels 20" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels TRIDENT vs ENKEI
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)