Last Update: Mar. 21, 2019, 5:35 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati Gransport and Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

What is Better Maserati Gransport or Mitsubishi Lancer Evo?

Exterior

Maserati Gransport Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

10 reasons to buy Maserati Gransport

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 11.1 vs 9.0 19% or 2.1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 92 mm vs 86 mm 7% or 6 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

400 bhp vs 290 bhp

295 kw. vs 217 kw.

28% or 110 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 451 nM vs 407 nM 10% or 44 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 16.1 mpg vs 27.41 mpg 70% or 11.31 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 22.61 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 54% or 12.3 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 10.8 mpg vs 19.9 mpg 84% or 9.1 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 88 liters vs 55 liters 38% or 33 liters
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.5 meters vs 11.8 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

8 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 79.8 mm 7% or 6.2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.7 sec. vs 4.95 sec. 0.25 sec.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 153 g/mile vs 249 g/mile 63% or 96 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum allowable weight 2040 kg vs 1980 kg 3% or 60 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 480 kg vs 250 kg 48% or 230 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 2 years 83% or 10 years
Other specs
Less weight 1560 kg vs 1730 kg 11% or 170 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

Neutral reasons Maserati Gransport vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 7000 RPM vs 6500 RPM 7% or 500 more rpms.
Engine capacity 4244 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 53% or 2246 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs DOHC VVT
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Turbocharged and intercooled
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4303 mm vs 4495 mm 4% or 192 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 1810 mm 1% or 12 mm wider
Height 1305 mm vs 1480 mm 12% or 175 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2440 mm vs 2650 mm 8% or 210 mm less
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 245/40 R18
Rear tires size 265/30 R19 vs 245/40 R18
Spare wheel kit for wheel pumping vs kit for wheel pumping
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels TROFEO vs ENKEI
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)