Last Update: Mar. 19, 2019, 5:24 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati GranTurismo and Skoda Roomster

What is Better Maserati GranTurismo or Skoda Roomster?

Exterior

Maserati GranTurismo Skoda Roomster

10 reasons to buy Maserati GranTurismo

Engine and transmission
Better compression 19.5 vs 11.3 42% or 8.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 84.5 mm 12% or 11 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 220 g/mile 156% or 134 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 450 liters vs 260 liters 42% or 190 liters
More maximum bearing capacity 515 kg vs 300 kg 42% or 215 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 10 years vs 2 years 80% or 8 years
More painted surfaces warranty 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1230 kg vs 1880 kg 53% or 650 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.5 meters vs 10.7 meters 2% or 0.2 meters
More seats 5 vs 4 1

13 reasons to buy Skoda Roomster

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 3 5 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston diameter larger 94 mm vs 79.5 mm 15% or 14.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

440 bhp vs 70 bhp

323 kw. vs 51 kw.

84% or 370 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 490 nM vs 155 nM 68% or 335 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5 sec. vs 16.5 sec. 11.5 sec.
More top speed 183 mph vs 98 mph 85 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.5 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 188% or 34.77 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.91 mpg vs 62.77 mpg 133% or 35.86 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 12.2 mpg vs 44.11 mpg 262% or 31.91 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 86 liters vs 55 liters 36% or 31 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2180 kg vs 1745 kg 20% or 435 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

Neutral reasons Maserati GranTurismo vs. Skoda Roomster

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 7000 RPM 43% or 3000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1422 cm3 vs 4691 cm3 70% or 3269 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V8
Camshaft SOHC vs QUAD CAM
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection with turbocharging vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4205 mm vs 4881 mm 14% or 676 mm shorter
Width 1684 mm vs 1915 mm 12% or 231 mm narrower
Height 1607 mm vs 1353 mm 16% or 254 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2617 mm vs 2942 mm 11% or 325 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R15 vs 245/40 R20
Rear tires size 195/55 R15 vs 285/40 R20
Spare wheel 195/55 R15 vs puncture repair kit
Type of wheels 15" steel vs 20" alloy wheels
Style of wheels Hermes vs TRIDENT
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)