Last Update: Nov. 23, 2017, 5:19 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Renault Fuego and Volvo 264

What is Better Renault Fuego or Volvo 264?

Exterior

Renault Fuego Volvo 264

2 reasons to buy Renault Fuego

Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 780 liters vs 395 liters 49% or 385 liters
Other specs
Less weight 934 kg vs 1350 kg 45% or 416 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Volvo 264

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

155 bhp vs 64 bhp

112 kw. vs 46 kw.

59% or 91 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 230 nM vs 101 nM 56% or 129 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.00 sec. vs 15.00 sec. 5 sec.
More top speed 115 mph vs 99 mph 16 mph
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 395 liters vs 338 liters 14% or 57 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1925 kg vs 1330 kg 31% or 595 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 575 kg vs 396 kg 31% or 179 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 650 kg vs 467 kg 28% or 183 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 800 kg 47% or 700 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 9.80 meters vs 10.20 meters 4% or 0.4 meters

Neutral reasons Renault Fuego vs. Volvo 264

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1397 cm3 vs 2849 cm3 51% or 1452 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4358 mm vs 4785 mm 9% or 427 mm shorter
Width 1692 mm vs 1707 mm 1% or 15 mm narrower
Height 1315 mm vs 1430 mm 8% or 115 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2443 mm vs 2640 mm 7% or 197 mm less
Front tires size 155SR13 vs 185/70HR14
Rear tires size 155SR13 vs 185/70HR14
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)