Last Update: Nov. 24, 2017, 5:18 a.m.
Home >>> >>> SEAT Ronda and Volvo 264

What is Better SEAT Ronda or Volvo 264?

Exterior

SEAT Ronda Volvo 264

3 reasons to buy SEAT Ronda

Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 1250 liters vs 395 liters 68% or 855 liters
Other specs
Less weight 895 kg vs 1350 kg 51% or 455 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.40 meters vs 9.80 meters 4% or 0.4 meters

10 reasons to buy Volvo 264

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

155 bhp vs 63 bhp

112 kw. vs 46 kw.

59% or 92 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 230 nM vs 88 nM 62% or 142 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.00 sec. vs 17.00 sec. 7 sec.
More top speed 115 mph vs 92 mph 23 mph
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 395 liters vs 370 liters 6% or 25 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1925 kg vs 1400 kg 27% or 525 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 575 kg vs 505 kg 12% or 70 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 650 kg vs 400 kg 38% or 250 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 1065 kg 29% or 435 kg

Neutral reasons SEAT Ronda vs. Volvo 264

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5800 RPM vs 5500 RPM 5% or 300 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1193 cm3 vs 2849 cm3 58% or 1656 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4011 mm vs 4785 mm 16% or 774 mm shorter
Width 1650 mm vs 1707 mm 3% or 57 mm narrower
Height 1400 mm vs 1430 mm 2% or 30 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2448 mm vs 2640 mm 7% or 192 mm less
Front tires size 155SR13 vs 185/70HR14
Rear tires size 155SR13 vs 185/70HR14
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)