Last Update: Nov. 24, 2017, 5:18 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Suzuki SC and Volvo 264

What is Better Suzuki SC or Volvo 264?

Exterior

Suzuki SC Volvo 264

2 reasons to buy Suzuki SC

Other specs
Less weight 648 kg vs 1350 kg 108% or 702 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 8.80 meters vs 9.80 meters 11% or 1 meters

9 reasons to buy Volvo 264

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

155 bhp vs 49 bhp

112 kw. vs 36 kw.

68% or 106 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 230 nM vs 83 nM 64% or 147 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.00 sec. vs 21.00 sec. 11 sec.
More top speed 115 mph vs 82 mph 33 mph
Weight and capacity
More maximum allowable weight 1925 kg vs 955 kg 50% or 970 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 575 kg vs 307 kg 47% or 268 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 650 kg vs 250 kg 62% or 400 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 450 kg 70% or 1050 kg

Neutral reasons Suzuki SC vs. Volvo 264

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 5500 RPM 9% or 500 less rpms.
Engine capacity 970 cm3 vs 2849 cm3 66% or 1879 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 5 1 less
Dimensions
Length 3200 mm vs 4785 mm 33% or 1585 mm shorter
Width 1395 mm vs 1707 mm 18% or 312 mm narrower
Height 1210 mm vs 1430 mm 15% or 220 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2030 mm vs 2640 mm 23% or 610 mm less
Front tires size 145/70R12 vs 185/70HR14
Rear tires size 145/70R12 vs 185/70HR14
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)