Last Update: Jun. 17, 2019, 5:16 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota MR2 and Volkswagen Eos

What is Better Toyota MR2 or Volkswagen Eos?

Exterior

Toyota MR2 Volkswagen Eos

7 reasons to buy Toyota MR2

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8 sec. vs 10.4 sec. 2.4 sec.
More top speed 131 mph vs 126 mph 5 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 47.11 mpg 23% or 8.92 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 47.87 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 18% or 8.59 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 28 mpg vs 35.28 mpg 26% or 7.28 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1030 kg vs 1548 kg 50% or 518 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 5 meters vs 10.9 meters 118% or 5.9 meters

11 reasons to buy Volkswagen Eos

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 10.0 46% or 8.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 81 mm vs 79 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 31.4 mm 67% or 64.1 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 320 nM vs 170 nM 47% or 150 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 98 g/mile vs 111 g/mile 13% or 13 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Less CO emissions 0 g/mile vs 1 g/mile 0% or 1 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 55 liters vs 48 liters 13% or 7 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2010 kg vs 1225 kg 39% or 785 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 462 kg vs 195 kg 58% or 267 kg
Other specs
More seats 4 vs 2 2

Neutral reasons Toyota MR2 vs. Volkswagen Eos

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6400 RPM vs 4000 RPM 38% or 2400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1794 cm3 vs 1968 cm3 9% or 174 cm3 less
Engine position Mid transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC VVT vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 3895 mm vs 4407 mm 12% or 512 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1791 mm 5% or 96 mm narrower
Height 1240 mm vs 1437 mm 14% or 197 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2450 mm vs 2578 mm 5% or 128 mm less
Front tires size 185/55 R15 vs 215/55 R16
Rear tires size 215/45 R16 vs 215/55 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs Compact
Type of wheels 15" F/16"R alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)