Last Update: Jun. 15, 2019, 5:59 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota MR2 and Volvo XC90

What is Better Toyota MR2 or Volvo XC90?

Exterior

Toyota MR2 Volvo XC90

6 reasons to buy Toyota MR2

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8 sec. vs 12.3 sec. 4.3 sec.
More top speed 131 mph vs 115 mph 16 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 111 g/mile vs 149 g/mile 34% or 38 g/mile
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 1030 kg vs 2049 kg 99% or 1019 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 5 meters vs 12.5 meters 150% or 7.5 meters

14 reasons to buy Volvo XC90

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 18.0 vs 10.0 44% or 8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 81 mm vs 79 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 93.2 mm vs 31.4 mm 66% or 61.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

163 bhp vs 140 bhp

120 kw. vs 103 kw.

14% or 23 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 340 nM vs 170 nM 50% or 170 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 31.38 mpg vs 38.19 mpg 22% or 6.81 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 38.19 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 25% or 9.68 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 23.91 mpg vs 28 mpg 17% or 4.09 mpg
Emissions
Less CO emissions 0 g/mile vs 1 g/mile 0% or 1 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 68 liters vs 48 liters 29% or 20 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2735 kg vs 1225 kg 55% or 1510 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 686 kg vs 195 kg 72% or 491 kg
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 2 5

Neutral reasons Toyota MR2 vs. Volvo XC90

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6400 RPM vs 4000 RPM 38% or 2400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1794 cm3 vs 2401 cm3 25% or 607 cm3 less
Engine position Mid transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC VVT vs SOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 3895 mm vs 4798 mm 19% or 903 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1898 mm 11% or 203 mm narrower
Height 1240 mm vs 1743 mm 29% or 503 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2450 mm vs 2857 mm 14% or 407 mm less
Front tires size 185/55 R15 vs 235/65 R17
Rear tires size 215/45 R16 vs 235/65 R17
Spare wheel Compact vs tyre sealant kit
Type of wheels 15" F/16"R alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)