Last Update: Jun. 18, 2019, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Alfa Romeo Crosswagon

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Alfa Romeo Crosswagon?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Alfa Romeo Crosswagon

5 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 40 mpg 37% or 10.9 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 48.96 mpg 35% or 12.76 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 29.99 mpg 38% or 8.3 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 1450 kg 3% or 50 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 1505 kg 5% or 65 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

6 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Crosswagon

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 126 bhp

109 kw. vs 94 kw.

16% or 24 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 305 nM vs 178 nM 42% or 127 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.50 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 1.2 sec.
More top speed 119 mph vs 109 mph 10 mph
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 360 liters vs 182 liters 49% or 178 liters

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Alfa Romeo Crosswagon

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 4000 RPM 26% or 1400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1910 cm3 4% or 88 cm3 more
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4441 mm 2% or 89 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1765 mm 4% or 70 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1497 mm 10% or 163 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 225/55R17
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 225/55R17
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)