Last Update: Mar. 24, 2019, 5:36 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Audi RS3

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Audi RS3?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Audi RS3

4 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 31.01 mpg 7% or 1.91 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 41.99 mpg 16% or 5.79 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 21.99 mpg 1% or 0.3 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 1550 kg 8% or 110 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

8 reasons to buy Audi RS3

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

340 bhp vs 126 bhp

247 kw. vs 94 kw.

63% or 214 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 450 nM vs 178 nM 60% or 272 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.60 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 7.1 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 109 mph 46 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 132 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 8% or 10 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 302 liters vs 182 liters 40% or 120 liters

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Audi RS3

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 2480 cm3 19% or 482 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 7 3 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4302 mm 5% or 228 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1794 mm 6% or 99 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1402 mm 16% or 258 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 225/35R19
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 225/35R19
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)