Last Update: Mar. 20, 2019, 5:04 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Audi S3

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Audi S3?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Audi S3

4 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 33.01 mpg 13% or 3.91 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 42.99 mpg 19% or 6.79 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 24.01 mpg 11% or 2.32 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 1455 kg 1% or 15 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

7 reasons to buy Audi S3

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

265 bhp vs 126 bhp

192 kw. vs 94 kw.

52% or 139 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 350 nM vs 178 nM 49% or 172 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.70 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 6 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 109 mph 46 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 123 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 15% or 19 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 281 liters vs 182 liters 35% or 99 liters

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Audi S3

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 6000 RPM 10% or 600 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1984 cm3 1% or 14 cm3 more
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4230 mm 7% or 300 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1765 mm 4% or 70 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1399 mm 16% or 261 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 225/40R18
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 225/40R18
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)