Last Update: May. 22, 2019, 5:27 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Mazda CX-9

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Mazda CX-9?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Mazda CX-9

2 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 142 g/mile vs 192 g/mile 35% or 50 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 2040 kg 42% or 600 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Mazda CX-9

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

273 bhp vs 126 bhp

198 kw. vs 94 kw.

54% or 147 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 366 nM vs 178 nM 51% or 188 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.10 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 1.6 sec.
More top speed 112 mph vs 109 mph 3 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 21.99 mpg vs 29.1 mpg 32% or 7.11 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 28.99 mpg vs 36.2 mpg 25% or 7.21 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 15 mpg vs 21.69 mpg 45% or 6.69 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 267 liters vs 182 liters 32% or 85 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1500 kg 6% or 100 kg

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Mazda CX-9

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 6250 RPM 14% or 850 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 3726 cm3 46% or 1728 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 5089 mm 11% or 559 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1936 mm 12% or 241 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1728 mm 4% or 68 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 245/50R20
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 245/50R20
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)