Last Update: Mar. 21, 2019, 5:35 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Volkswagen Caravelle

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Volkswagen Caravelle?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Volkswagen Caravelle

9 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 79.5 mm 8% or 6.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

126 bhp vs 104 bhp

94 kw. vs 76 kw.

17% or 22 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 11.7 sec. vs 18.4 sec. 6.7 sec.
More top speed 109 mph vs 99 mph 10 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 36.7 mpg 26% or 7.6 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 17% or 6.02 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 29.69 mpg 37% or 8 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 2199 kg 53% or 759 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

9 reasons to buy Volkswagen Caravelle

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 9.5 49% or 9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 86 mm 10% or 9.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 250 nM vs 178 nM 29% or 72 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 129 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 10% or 13 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 3 vs EURO 2 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 60 liters 25% or 20 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2200 kg vs 1500 kg 32% or 700 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 6 1

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Volkswagen Caravelle

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 3500 RPM 35% or 1900 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1896 cm3 5% or 102 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 5 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4890 mm 7% or 360 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1904 mm 11% or 209 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1949 mm 15% or 289 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 215/65 R16
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 215/65 R16
Spare wheel 195/65R14 steel vs 215/65 R16 steel
Type of wheels 14 alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)