Last Update: Mar. 20, 2019, 5:04 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Volkswagen Polo

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Volkswagen Polo?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Volkswagen Polo

5 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 65% or 18.77 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 55.4 mpg 53% or 19.2 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 74% or 16.01 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 45 liters 25% or 15 liters
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 5 1

8 reasons to buy Volkswagen Polo

Engine and transmission
More engine power

180 bhp vs 126 bhp

132 kw. vs 94 kw.

30% or 54 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 250 nM vs 178 nM 29% or 72 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.9 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 4.8 sec.
More top speed 142 mph vs 109 mph 33 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 65% or 56 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 280 liters vs 182 liters 35% or 98 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Volkswagen Polo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 6200 RPM 13% or 800 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1390 cm3 30% or 608 cm3 more
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Turbocharged and supercharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 7 3 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 3870 mm 15% or 660 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1682 mm 1% or 13 mm wider
Height 1660 mm vs 1485 mm 11% or 175 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 215/40 R17
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 215/40 R17
Spare wheel 195/65R14 steel vs Compact
Type of wheels 14 alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)