Last Update: Jun. 16, 2019, 5:18 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Volkswagen Sharan

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Volkswagen Sharan?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Volkswagen Sharan

4 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 39.2 mpg 35% or 10.1 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 28% or 10.07 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 30.69 mpg 41% or 9 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 1723 kg 20% or 283 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

9 reasons to buy Volkswagen Sharan

Engine and transmission
More engine power

150 bhp vs 126 bhp

110 kw. vs 94 kw.

16% or 24 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 240 nM vs 178 nM 26% or 62 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.7 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 1 sec.
More top speed 122 mph vs 109 mph 13 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 104 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 37% or 38 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 60 liters 14% or 10 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1800 kg vs 1500 kg 17% or 300 kg
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 6 1

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Volkswagen Sharan

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 5800 RPM 7% or 400 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1390 cm3 30% or 608 cm3 more
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Turbocharged and supercharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 5 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4854 mm 7% or 324 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1904 mm 11% or 209 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1720 mm 3% or 60 mm lower
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)