Last Update: Mar. 26, 2019, 5:14 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Volkswagen Tiguan

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Volkswagen Tiguan?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Volkswagen Tiguan

6 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 81 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 44.78 mpg 54% or 15.68 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 51.42 mpg 42% or 15.22 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 36.7 mpg 69% or 15.01 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 1609 kg 12% or 169 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 6 vs 5 1

12 reasons to buy Volkswagen Tiguan

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 9.5 49% or 9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 86 mm 10% or 9.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

170 bhp vs 126 bhp

125 kw. vs 94 kw.

26% or 44 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 350 nM vs 178 nM 49% or 172 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.9 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 2.8 sec.
More top speed 125 mph vs 109 mph 16 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 103 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 38% or 39 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 430 liters vs 182 liters 58% or 248 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 64 liters vs 60 liters 6% or 4 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2200 kg vs 1500 kg 32% or 700 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Volkswagen Tiguan

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 4400 RPM 19% or 1000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1968 cm3 2% or 30 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4427 mm 2% or 103 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1809 mm 6% or 114 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1686 mm 2% or 26 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 235/55 R17
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 235/55 R17
Spare wheel 195/65R14 steel vs Compact
Type of wheels 14 alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)