Last Update: May. 25, 2019, 5:11 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Volvo S70

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Volvo S70?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Volvo S70

5 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Better compression 9.5 vs 8.5 11% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 81 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 29.39 mpg 1% or 0.29 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 38.19 mpg 5% or 1.99 mpg
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 5 1

11 reasons to buy Volvo S70

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 86 mm 4% or 4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

240 bhp vs 126 bhp

176 kw. vs 94 kw.

48% or 114 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 330 nM vs 178 nM 46% or 152 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 4.7 sec.
More top speed 152 mph vs 109 mph 43 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.2 mpg vs 21.69 mpg 2% or 0.49 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 68 liters vs 60 liters 12% or 8 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1500 kg 6% or 100 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1376 kg vs 1440 kg 5% or 64 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Volvo S70

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 2319 cm3 14% or 321 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Multi-point fuel injection with turbo
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 5 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4720 mm 4% or 190 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1760 mm 4% or 65 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1390 mm 16% or 270 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 205/50R16W
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 205/50R16W
Spare wheel 195/65R14 steel vs 205/50R16 steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)