Last Update: May. 27, 2019, 5:39 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Volvo V50

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Volvo V50?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Volvo V50

6 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 85 mm 1% or 1 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 48.66 mpg 67% or 19.56 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 58.85 mpg 63% or 22.65 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 37.22 mpg 72% or 15.53 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 52 liters 13% or 8 liters
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 5 1

11 reasons to buy Volvo V50

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 9.5 49% or 9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 88 mm vs 86 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

136 bhp vs 126 bhp

100 kw. vs 94 kw.

7% or 10 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 178 nM 44% or 142 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 2.1 sec.
More top speed 130 mph vs 109 mph 21 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 96 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 48% or 46 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 417 liters vs 182 liters 56% or 235 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1404 kg vs 1440 kg 3% or 36 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Volvo V50

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 4000 RPM 26% or 1400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 0% or 1 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4514 mm 0% or 16 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1770 mm 4% or 75 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1452 mm 13% or 208 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 205/55 R16
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 205/55 R16
Spare wheel 195/65R14 steel vs ORARY
Type of wheels 14 alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)